<sectN> is largely a
question of flexibility. The stylesheets can make a
<section> in a
<section> look just
<sect2> within a
<sect1>, so there's no output advantage.
<section> within a
<section> can be extracted into its own
top-level section, nested even more deeply, or moved to an
entirely different part of the document, without it and its own
<section> children being renamed. That is not true of the
numbered section tags, which are very sensitive to
rearrangements. This can be easier for authors who are new to
DocBook than using
The main idea behind creating structured data is that it should be easy
to access and query. One should be able to retrieve a subsection of any
structured data, by using querying languages for XML (XPath and XQuery).
<sectN> are useful when traversing a document using XPath/XQuery.
<sectN> gives more flexibility, and control while writing an XPath
A well-defined, valid and well-structured document makes it easier for
one to write XPath/Query to retreive “specific” data from a document.
For example you can use XPath to retrieve information in the
<sect3> block with certain attributes.
However if you just used
<section> for all subsections,
it becomes harder to retrieve the block of information that you need.
So which one should you use? The one you feel most
comfortable with is a good place to start. This document
is written with
<section>s. You may,
or may not, think this is a good idea. :)